Viper Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 I think we should have AWACS on station. lets vote on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 We in the 104th want it too, but having them in the missions make DCS too unstable. We value stability more and believe the public like to fly in a stable version of DCS too. Besides, AWACs always lie to you. "PICTURE CLEAN" Yeah right. Or they don't answer you anyway. Viper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiJack Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Agree, the AWACS is not good. Then it would be better to open up for a human lotatc player. But lotatc can be misused to cheat on the server as you cant see how many is connected to the application. Password change every day? No, don't think thats a good solution. To bad DArt did not want to create code to limit the number of users. Viper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted May 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 We in the 104th want it too, but having them in the missions make DCS too unstable. We value stability more and believe the public like to fly in a stable version of DCS too. Besides, AWACs always lie to you. "PICTURE CLEAN" Yeah right. Or they don't answer you anyway. yeah, hopefully in DCS Edge they will have better AWACS! Agree, the AWACS is not good. Then it would be better to open up for a human lotatc player. But lotatc can be misused to cheat on the server as you cant see how many is connected to the application. Password change every day? No, don't think thats a good solution. To bad DArt did not want to create code to limit the number of users. same for you i hope they will fix it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 What if we add LotATC to the server, and players who are willing to give dopes, and pictures to pilots can play to AWACS role. That might give the server a more realistic feel. Human AWACS is common in the Falcon community as far as I know. Viper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
104th_Maverick Posted May 10, 2015 Report Share Posted May 10, 2015 LotATC causes performance issues on our server due to the number of clients flying in it and the number of ground units contained in the missions. We are working with the developer of LotATC to optimize it for our high demand requirements but it will take some time, we will be running some LotATC tests in the next few weeks but they will low key one mission tests. The long term plan is to have LotATC running all the time in the server and have Squadron members and invited guests such as the 51st providing Fighter Control services as much as possible for both sides. We ironically do not intent to use it for ATC however, just Fighter Control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted May 11, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Awesome! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiJack Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Well, finally there is a way to lock lotATC to a fixed number of controllers for each side. So locking it to one for each side would be something to test and see if this also helps on frames. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 LotATC causes performance issues on our server due to the number of clients flying in it and the number of ground units contained in the missions. We are working with the developer of LotATC to optimize it for our high demand requirements but it will take some time, we will be running some LotATC tests in the next few weeks but they will low key one mission tests. The long term plan is to have LotATC running all the time in the server and have Squadron members and invited guests such as the 51st providing Fighter Control services as much as possible for both sides. We ironically do not intent to use it for ATC however, just Fighter Control. It is good to hear that new things will come! It is logical to have it only for fighter control. Maybe if more then one person is willing to use the LotATC at one time it could be used for ATC. Agree, the AWACS is not good. Then it would be better to open up for a human lotatc player. But lotatc can be misused to cheat on the server as you cant see how many is connected to the application. Password change every day? No, don't think thats a good solution. To bad DArt did not want to create code to limit the number of users. I think if someone wants to use LotATC certain rules must apply to them. Eg. they must be on TS. And anyone who is caught using it at one time will be banned permanently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMike Posted May 19, 2015 Report Share Posted May 19, 2015 No need for a poll really, as explained above. As long as both tankers and Awacs are not fixed by ED they won't be in the server. As soon as they will be fixed, they'll be in. Same counts for EWR. S! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.